FCC Adopts Stricter Broadband Reporting Standards
It’s been a long time coming, but the FCC has finally (and unanimously) voted for several key changes to the way we collect information on broadband internet coverage.
Among the changes made:
• Raising the FCC’s definition of “high speed” Internet from a sluggish 200 Kbps to 768 Kbps.
• Requiring the reporting of both download and upload speeds.
• Creating more refined tiers of Internet speeds, as opposed to the current use of broad categories that often misrepresent people’s actual speeds.
• Requiring service providers to report more detailed connection speed data at the census-block level, instead of the zip code level.
I heard each of these concerns mentioned last year at Rep. Zack Space’s “Connect Appalachia” summits and it’s really great to see that these concerns have finally been addressed. With the information gathered under these new reporting standards we’ll be able to more accurately assess the state of broadband internet in the country and act accordingly.
On a side note, I’ve recently traded in my dial-up connection for a much faster satellite option. After using it for about a week I’ve only affirmed my belief that satellite internet should not be viewed as a long term solution for rural broadband in it’s current form. But that’s a whole other post.
Now I’ve got a small favor to ask of everyone. Below is a small box that will test you’re internet connection and send the results back to SpeedMatters.org, an organization pushing for national broadband. Every year they take this data and put together a very informative report on the spread of broadband for each state, including a map showing average connection speed in each area. Please consider taking it.

March 22nd, 2008 at 10:16 pm
I ran the test and submitted the results. Download was 957, upload was 485.
I use wireless over my home network (G technology), cable internet.
I also use a Sprint broadband access (cellular). It’s not as fast as cable, but better than dial-up. I think it’s about $65/month. I used to pay it myself (it was discounted to about $50/month with company discounts), but a few months ago, my company began paying for it directly, so I don’t see the bill anymore.
March 23rd, 2008 at 9:48 am
My satellite download speed this morning is actually 1048 kbps, but last night when it was cloudy it was only around 500 kbps. It seems to be extremely sensitive to the weather. Taking the test multiple times without clearing the cache might have made a difference as well, though I did it twice last night with similar results.
Both times the upload was around 100 kbps. Those results are also over a wireless G network.
It’s significantly faster than dial-up, but when downloading small files (like simple webpages, small pictures) the speed is negated by the transmission delay.
March 25th, 2008 at 10:29 pm
Oh, and thanks for taking it. I forgot my manners (what little I have) there for a while.